Duane Morris attorney Richard Redano admits that he stood up in court and made statements about the law that were wrong.

Richard Redano admits that he submitted jury interrogatories based on the false premise that the Houston company had the burden on the secondary meaning issue.

Richard Redano concedes that his proposed jury instructions contained statements of law that were wrong. But he insists that he did understand the law and simply wrote it down incorrectly.

Once again, Richard Redano concedes that his proposed jury instructions contained statements of law that were wrong. And once again, he insists
that he understood the law and simply wrote it down incorrectly.

In his closing argument to the jury, Richard Redano showcases his mistaken belief that the Houston company had the burden on the secondary meaning issue.

Richard Redano told the District Court that secondary meaning was not an issue in the case. Understandably, the Court was mystified.

Richard Redano discusses why he chose not to plead secondary meaning in the TestMasters mark. At the same time he touts himself as an intellectual property attorney.

Richard Redano admits that he failed to prepare his client to answer questions on the secondary meaning issue.

Richard Redano commits perjury in an effort to conceal his misunderstanding of the law.

Richard Redano describes his “less is more” approach to proving secondary meaning. He feared that too much evidence might put the jury to sleep.

Richard Redano attempts to explain why he chose to hide all of TestMasters’ sales and revenue data from the courts.

Richard Redano fields questions about the secondary meaning evidence he omitted from the record. He confesses that he failed to interview a single consumer witness, even though the concept of secondary meaning is rooted in consumer perception.

In 2000, a Princeton Review franchise owner asserted under oath that TestMasters dominates the LSAT preparation market in Orange County.
Richard Redano attempts to explain why he failed to introduce this critical testimony at the 2001 trial.

The Fifth Circuit’s 2002 opinion states that with respect to establishing secondary meaning, the probative value of advertising “depends on the presence of data regarding its reach, frequency, and duration”. Richard Redano did not introduce any such evidence at trial, but maintains that this was a deliberate strategy on his part.

Richard Redano makes a feeble attempt to downplay the importance of the secondary meaning issue.

Richard Redano discusses his game plan to win the case.

The Fifth Circuit ruled that Richard Redano had failed to introduce legally sufficient evidence of secondary meaning. Mr. Redano discusses the ruling and concludes that the Fifth Circuit was wrong.

Richard Redano testifies that he submitted an “abundance” of secondary meaning evidence, even though the Fifth Circuit held that he submitted “little or no evidence” at all.

Richard Redano mistakenly believed that the cutoff year for producing secondary meaning evidence was 1994, when in fact it was 2001. Mr. Redano refuses to acknowledge his error and complains that the Fifth Circuit changed the law.

In a ridiculous attempt to discredit the Fifth Circuit, Richard Redano argues that “quantity” means “percentage” and not “number”.

Richard Redano reminisces about one of his losing arguments.

Richard Redano admits that Robin Singh owned the rights to the name TestMasters in 49 of the 50 states. Mr. Redano’s malpractice resulted in the loss of these rights, thereby enabling the Houston company to use the TestMasters name to defraud consumers across the nation.

As a result of Richard Redano’s failure to establish secondary meaning, TestMasters lost ownership of the testmasters.com domain name. But according to Mr. Redano, this was no big deal because his clients did not really care about the domain name anyway.

Richard Redano discusses Duane Morris’s deceptive advertising, which is designed to fool consumers into believing that Mr. Redano won the case.

Even after losing his client’s federal trademark, Richard Redano still does not understand the law.

Duane Morris attorney Gary Maze admits that he failed to understand the law even after the Fifth Circuit released its decision.

Gary Maze passes the buck to his partner Richard Redano.

Would somebody please send Mr. Maze a dictionary?

TES president Roger Israni doesn’t know if helping confused consumers is the right thing to do.

TES president Roger Israni discusses his company’s unsatisfactory Better Business Bureau rating.

TES president Roger Israni knows nothing about the LSAT instructors that supposedly work for his company.

TES president Roger Israni admits that his company has no process for training its LSAT instructors.

TES president Roger Israni has no idea who created his company’s LSAT course materials.

TES president Roger Israni claims to be totally ignorant of even the most basic facts about his business.

TES president Roger Israni answers questions about the fictitious addresses TES lists on its website for its fictitious LSAT classes.

No one knows where TES holds its LSAT classes—not even TES president Roger Israni.